Companies Act, Section 438: Application of Criminal Procedure Code to Proceedings Before Special Courts
Section 438 of the Companies Act, 2013 lays down the procedural foundation for criminal trials conducted by Special Courts established under Section 435.
Since Special Courts are responsible for handling offences committed under the Companies Act, many of which involve complex financial misconduct, this provision ensures that their functioning remains aligned with the standard criminal justice mechanisms in India.
By applying the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) to these proceedings, the law guarantees discipline, fairness, and consistency in the administration of justice.
1. Application of the Code of Criminal Procedure
This section explicitly states that, unless the Companies Act provides a different or special procedure, the CrPC will apply to all proceedings before Special Courts. This means:
Criminal trials under company law are governed by the same procedural rules that apply to general criminal cases across the country.
Rights such as cross-examination, bail, evidence handling, and appeal procedures remain consistent with established criminal law protections.
Any deviation from CrPC must be clearly specified within the Companies Act itself, preventing arbitrary or uncertain procedures.
This ensures that Special Courts follow well-recognized judicial standards and that the accused receives procedural fairness.
2. Status of Special Courts Under Criminal Procedure Law
To ensure smooth application of CrPC provisions, Section 438 assigns a specific judicial status to Special Courts based on the severity of offences being tried:
For serious corporate offences punishable with imprisonment of two years or more, the Special Court is treated as a Court of Session.
For less serious corporate offences, the Special Court is deemed equivalent to a Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate First Class. This classification ensures:
Proper exercise of judicial powers corresponding to the seriousness of the crime.
Procedural validity in issuing warrants, sentencing, and granting bail.
Compatibility with the appellate and revisional framework under criminal law.
It helps maintain the hierarchical discipline of courts and prevents jurisdictional ambiguities.
3. Status of Prosecutor Before Special Courts
The section further declares that the individual conducting prosecution in a Special Court shall be deemed a Public Prosecutor. This is important because:
Only qualified and legally authorized persons can represent the State in criminal proceedings.
It safeguards the fairness and integrity of prosecutions. It ensures accountability and adherence to ethical standards in trials involving corporate offences.
This recognition places Special Court proceedings firmly within the mainstream criminal justice framework of India.
4. Purpose and Importance of Section 438
The significance of this section lies in its role in maintaining legal stability and credibility. It ensures:
Harmonized criminal procedures, preventing confusion due to conflicting rules.
Protection of constitutional and legal rights of the accused, including fair trial guarantees.
Efficient and lawful prosecution of corporate crimes by trained legal practitioners.
Strengthening of judicial oversight and legitimacy of Special Court proceedings.
Smooth appellate and supervisory functioning within the national criminal justice system.
© 2020 CREDENCE CORPORATE SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. | Website by Wits Digtal Pvt. Ltd.
Leave a Comment