Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 100: Protest
Section 100 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 deals with the formal protest of a dishonoured promissory note or bill of exchange and allows the holder to obtain an official certificate of dishonour from a notary public known as a protest.
The section also recognizes a special form of protest called a protest for better security, which may be made before maturity where the acceptor becomes insolvent or his financial credit is publicly questioned.
1. Meaning of Protest
A protest is a formal certificate issued by a notary public certifying that a negotiable instrument has been dishonoured and officially recording the fact and circumstances of such dishonour.
The protest also records the refusal of acceptance or payment and serves as strong and authentic evidence in commercial as well as legal proceedings.
2. Applicability of the Provision
Section 100 applies to promissory notes and bills of exchange that have been dishonoured either by non-acceptance or by non-payment.
After such dishonour, the holder is entitled to have the instrument formally protested by a notary public.
3. Role of the Holder
The holder of the dishonoured instrument may, within a reasonable time, approach a notary public and request official certification of the dishonour through protest.
The holder is responsible for initiating the process of protest, and the provision thereby provides an important evidentiary safeguard against disputes relating to dishonour.
4. Role of the Notary Public
A notary public is a legally authorized officer empowered to certify commercial acts relating to negotiable instruments, including verifying dishonour, recording relevant facts, and issuing an official certificate of protest.
5. Requirement of Reasonable Time
The section requires dishonour to be noted and certified within a reasonable time to preserve evidence, protect rights against prior parties, and maintain commercial certainty.
6. Protest as Formal Evidence
A protest serves as official proof that the instrument was duly presented and dishonoured by refusal of acceptance or payment, thereby reducing disputes and facilitating enforcement proceedings.
7. Protest for Better Security
The section also recognizes a special form of protest known as “protest for better security,” which may occur before the maturity of the bill in exceptional circumstances.
8. Circumstances for Protest for Better Security
A protest for better security may arise where the acceptor becomes insolvent or his credit is publicly impeached before maturity, thereby creating doubt about his ability to pay the bill when due.
9. Insolvency of Acceptor
If the acceptor becomes insolvent before maturity, thereby creating uncertainty and increasing the risk of non-payment, the law allows the holder to seek additional protection.
10. Public Impeachment of Credit
Public impeachment of credit refers to circumstances where the acceptor’s financial reputation or creditworthiness becomes publicly doubtful, such as financial failure, suspension of payments, or serious financial instability, thereby justifying a demand for better security.
11. Demand for Better Security
In such situations, the holder may require the acceptor to provide better security for payment of the bill, including an additional guarantee, collateral assurance, or other adequate financial protection.
12. Refusal to Provide Better Security
If the acceptor refuses to provide better security, the holder may have the refusal officially noted and certified by a notary public, resulting in a protest for better security.
Get expert support for GST, Company Registration, Trademark, Taxation and Compliance Services.
Get Free Consultation© 2020 CREDENCE CORPORATE SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. | Website by Wits Digtal Pvt. Ltd.
Leave a Comment