Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 129: Payment of Crossed Cheque Out of Due Course
Section 129 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 provides that a banker who pays a crossed cheque contrary to its crossing instructions is liable to the true owner for any resulting loss.
The section imposes a statutory duty on bankers to strictly comply with the rules governing crossed cheques and serves as an important safeguard against wrongful payment and fraud.
1. Meaning of Crossed Cheque
A crossed cheque is a cheque bearing crossing marks or directions on its face requiring payment through banking channels, whether by general or special crossing, thereby enhancing the security of cheque transactions.
2. Meaning of Payment Out of Due Course
Payment out of due course refers to payment made in violation of the legal requirements governing crossed cheques, such as ignoring crossing instructions or acting negligently, and such payment is not protected by law.
3. Purpose of Section 129
The object of Section 129 is to ensure strict compliance with the statutory rules governing crossed cheques and to protect the true owner from wrongful encashment.
The provision promotes careful banking practices, maintains confidence in cheque transactions, and imposes liability on bankers for negligent or wrongful payment.
4. Liability in Case of General Crossing
Where a generally crossed cheque is paid by the drawee banker otherwise than to a banker, the payment is improper and the banker becomes liable to the true owner for any resulting loss.
5. Meaning of General Crossing
A cheque is crossed generally when it bears two parallel transverse lines, with or without words such as & Co. or Not Negotiable, requiring payment through banking channels rather than by direct cash payment.
6. Liability in Case of Special Crossing
Where a cheque is crossed specially, the banker must pay only to the banker named in the crossing or that banker’s collecting agent, and any payment made otherwise is improper.
7. Meaning of Special Crossing
A cheque is specially crossed when it bears the name of a specific banker across its face, directing that payment be routed only through that banker and thereby imposing stricter payment instructions.
8. Liability to the True Owner
Where improper payment occurs, the banker becomes liable to the true owner of the cheque, being the person legally entitled to its amount, for any loss sustained as a result of the wrongful payment.
9. Nature of Banker’s Liability
The banker’s liability under Section 129 is statutory in nature and may arise when a crossed cheque is paid improperly.
The banker may be required to compensate the true owner for the amount wrongfully paid, the financial loss suffered, and any consequential loss directly resulting from such payment.
10. Importance of Compliance with Crossing Instructions
Crossing instructions are intended to provide safety and traceability in cheque transactions and to reduce the risk of fraud.
Strict compliance is necessary because banking channels create transaction records and wrongful payment may defeat the protective purpose of crossing, requiring the banker to act carefully and diligently.
11. Duty of the Banker
The banker must verify the nature of the crossing, the proper collecting banker, and compliance with statutory instructions, as failure to exercise reasonable care may result in liability.
Get expert support for GST, Company Registration, Trademark, Taxation and Compliance Services.
Get Free Consultation© 2020 CREDENCE CORPORATE SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. | Website by Wits Digtal Pvt. Ltd.
Leave a Comment